American Physical Therapy Association / 3
theoretical knowledge to specific interventions. Patients and families are more optimistic about recovery due to
greater levels of mobility. We aim to implement similar rounds in other ICU units in the near future, sharing our
model and outcomes.
Importance to Members: Early mobility in the critical care setting requires more than just knowledge of
physiology and medical treatments. A culture of seamless interprofessional communication and teamwork
must be developed for any plan to be successful. We have found that a minimal time commitment (1 hour per
week) can be extremely valuable to instituting and maintaining an early mobility program that is truly embraced
by all disciplines. Physical therapists are the logical champions of mobility in the critical care environment, but
must be effective interprofessional team members in leading the necessary culture change
References (At Least 5 Within The Last 10 Years)
1. Adler J, Malone D. Early mobilization in the intensive care unit: A systematic review. Cardiopulm Phys Ther
J 2012;23(1):5-13.
2. Hodgson CL, Capell E, Tipping CJ. Early mobilization of patients in intensive care: Organization,
communication and safety factors that influence translation into clinical practice. Crit Care 2018;22:77.
3. Costa DK, Whilte MR, Ginier E, et al. Identifying barriers to delivering the awakening and breathing
coordination, delirium, and early exercise/mobility bundle to minimize adverse outcomes for mechanically
ventilated patients: a systematic review. Chest 2017;152:304-11.
4. Parry SM, Knight LD, Connolly B, et al. Factors influencing physical activity and rehabilitation in survivors of
critical illness: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Intensive Care Med 2017;43:531-42.
5. Holdsworth C, Haines KJ, Francis JJ, et al. Mobilization of ventilated patients in the intensive care unit: An
elicitation study using the theory of planned behavior. J Crit Care 2015;30(6):143-1250.
Case Study Report
Title: Successful Non-Operative Management of a Collegiate Wrestler with an Acute ACL Injury
Background and Purpose: Following an ACL injury, conventional treatment for athletes is often
reconstruction; yet, current outcomes demonstrate that rates of return to prior level of play are lower than
believed.
1,2,3,4
In a study comparing immediate surgical treatment, delayed surgical treatment, or non-operative
treatment of ACL tears; no significant difference in patient reported outcomes were found.
5
Non-operative
management has been shown to be a viable option following a treatment algorithm. In a 10-year prospective
study of this algorithm
6
, athletes who met non-operative screening criteria (potential copers or PC)
demonstrated a 72% successful return to pre-injury level of sports participation.
7,8
The algorithm provides
criteria for a temporary return to sport (RTS) protocol, initially focusing on impairment resolution including full
range of motion (ROM) of the knee, >70% quad strength index (QI), trace or less effusion, pain-free hopping,
and no repairable meniscus tear. Screening includes: ≤1 episode of giving way, >80% on timed hop test,
>80% Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS), and >60% Global Rating Scale
(GRS). If met, progressive physical therapy is initiated, including 10 visits of perturbation training and sports
specific skills. The purpose of this case report is to describe the successful non-operative treatment of a
collegiate wrestler using an ACL injury treatment algorithm for temporary RTS.
Case Description: A 21 y/o male collegiate wrestler sustained a complete ACL tear in pre-season. The
patient was seen for evaluation 2 weeks after his injury displaying full knee ROM, trace effusion, and QI of
92.3% (without stimulation) and 85.6% (with stimulation) via Burst Superimposition testing. Using the ACL