31
1) Large-area capacity expansion models will often inforce a peak capacity requirement that is a proxy
for resource adequacy. Commercial models may often include resource adequacy calculations
2) Most production cost models can provide full Loss of Load Expectation/Loss of Load Probability
(LOLE/LOLP) calculations. There are also several dedicated models that perform resource adequacy
calculations, including stochastics
3) Most capacity expansion models do not include full chronology. However many have the ability to
capture some aspect of the need for flexibility, by either running chronological dispatch during some
sub set of time periods, or imposing a flexibility constraint in the objective function
4) Most capacity expansion models have a very rudimentary treatment of transmission. However some
will enforce constraints that require additional transmission when new resources are added
5) Most production cost models now include DC optimized power flow which measures some aspects of
transmission adequacy (such as thermal limits on certain lines) However due to computational
complexity, full transmission power flow analysis is not possible
6) PCMs simulate the holding of reserves in each time period. These reserves should be adequate to
meet contingency events, but the actual consequences of contingencies cannot be tested with a PCM.
7) Actually simulates a contingency event to ensure reliable operation
8) As with contingency reserves, PCMs can enforce holding of regulating reserves (and potentially even
primary frequency response) but cannot simulate the operation of reserves to check frequency
stability
9) Most network reliability models don’t simulate regulation reserves, which kick in after inertia and
primary frequency response. There is a limited set of models (I only know of one) that can simulate
the full response to frequency deviations, because they combine physics-based dynamic models with
semi-economics/rule-based automatic generation control models.