15
various priorities were identied and have been
or are in the process of being addressed. An
inadequate budget was one of the most notable
challenges. Moreover, it became evident that
sta morale was at an all-time low, due to lack
of capacity and resources.
With the support of National Treasury (NT) and
the Department of Justice and Constitutional
Development (DoJ&CD), we engaged in a
rigorous budget advocacy process. During the
Adjusted Estimates of National Expenditure
(AENE) process, these eorts led to additional
budget allocations to the NPA. Thanks to this
critical budget injection, we were able to commit
to implementing game-changing resourcing
interventions. After recruitment had not taken
place for over four years, the NPA embarked
on a massive recruitment drive. To date, more
than 900 posts have been advertised and are
in various stages of the appointment process.
We procured more than 4 000 laptops for
prosecutors and support sta to ensure that
they have the necessary tools for their jobs.
After a four-year moratorium, we also revived
the Aspirant Prosecutor Programme with the
assistance and support of the DoJ&CD. After an
initial internal intake of 98 candidates, a much
larger intake was advertised a few months later.
Despite the challenges relating to insucient
budget allocations, the NPA has continued to
deliver services to the people of South Africa.
This was made possible by the resilience and
commitment of NPA sta. Having anticipated
the eect this might have on employees’
well-being, the Employee Wellness Programme
became a focal point despite resource
constraints. Going forward, the EWP will need to
be up-scaled to further support the emotional,
mental and physical wellbeing of sta.
We convened two national conferences for
senior and middle management respectively.
Here, sta were given an opportunity to engage
in a new vision and approach for the NPA. My
vision for the NPA is ambitious – to rebuild
and lead an eective prosecution service that
ensures justice for all South Africans through
independent, professional and victim-centric
service delivery. As a collective in the NPA,
we resolved that we would work together to
build an organisation that is independent,
professional, accountable and credible.
At a time when our country is engulfed in
one of the most pressing challenges facing
the economy – corruption – we were found
wanting. We did not have adequate capacity
and skills to deal with the highest levels of
corruption. When corruption ourishes,
there can be no meaningful economic
growth, sustainable development, signicant
investment and eective service delivery. As
a result, all South Africans suer, especially
the poor, who rely on state services for their
wellbeing and survival. For too long, corrupt
politicians, government employees and
business leaders have acted with impunity
to plunder the country’s scarce resources.
They have done so in plain sight in the most
brazen ways imaginable. In some instances,
allegations of complicity, aiding and abetting
the corruption and State Capture within the
law enforcement agencies, and indeed within
the NPA, were exposed.
The Investigating Directorate (ID) was
proclaimed by Presidential Proclamation on
4 April 2019; the Investigating Director was
appointed a month later. Established in the
Oce of the National Director, in terms of
Section 7 of the National Prosecuting Authority
Act, 1998 (Act No. 32 of 1998) (NPA Act), the ID
was given a specic mandate to focus on State
Capture-related corruption that emerged from
the various commissions of enquiry, including
the State Capture Commission led by the
Deputy Chief Justice, Judge Raymond Zondo.
As a temporary intervention, the ID has had its
share of systematic challenges and obstacles in
its establishment, and operations, an expected
impact of an intervention of this nature. The
ID was not established as a silver bullet to deal
with corruption, but as an urgent and focused