HOWEVER , in practice, the position is usually different:
• The 4 nth edition 2002(2) form of the Auckland District Law Society lease (ADLS lease) allows
the landlord to require the current guarantor (at the time that the renewal is exercised) to guarantee
the renewed lease.
• A High Court decision [1] has interpreted the renewal clause in the 3 rd edition of the ADLS
lease as giving an extension of the existing term of the lease, and not a renewal of the lease. This
means that under the 3 rd edition of the ADLS lease, the original guarantor and any subsequent
guarantors would be liable during the extended term, even if they do not sign any further
documents. Although this decision is the current law it will be interesting whether it is followed in
future decisions.
[1] If a lease has been assigned, are the original tenant and guarantor liable under a renewal of
lease?
No - the original tenant and guarantor are not liable under the renewed lease where the lease has
been assigned.
HOWEVER, in practice, the position is sometimes different: :
• The original tenant and guarantor are not liable because the new lease will be signed by the
assignee and the original contractual relationship between the original tenant, the guarantor and
the landlord is lost.
• However, if the renewal clause is interpreted as an extension of the term, as it was in the Powell
decision, then the contractual relationship between the original tenant, guarantor and landlord
would continue and therefore, the original tenant and guarantor would continue to be liable to the
landlord if the lease is renewed by an assignee.
• Whether subsequent tenants and guarantors, who, in turn, have assigned the lease, would be
liable where a renewal has been interpreted as an extension of the term, will depend on whether a
covenant was entered into between the subsequent tenant and guarantor and the landlord to
create a contractual relationship. If such a covenant was entered into (which is usual), then
subsequent tenants and guarantors, who have assigned the lease, would also be liable under such
an extension of term.
If a landlord sells the property, section 112 of the Property Law Act 1952 means that the new
landlord can pursue the existing tenant and, most probably, the original tenant [2] , for any
breaches of the lease.
What if the tenant does not exercise the renewal in the timeframe stipulated in the lease?
Recent decisions [3] indicate that the landlord must remind the tenant that the lease is due for
renewal and therefore give the tenant every opportunity to renew the lease. The tenant otherwise
has the right to apply to the court for relief against the lease being terminated by the landlord.