© November 2012 | 2000 Daniel Island Drive, Charleston, SC 29492 T 800.443.9441 E [email protected] W www.blackbaud.com
AN INVESTIGATION INTO WHAT DRIVES YOUR DONORS TO GIVE
Donor Perspectives:
© November 2012 | 2000 Daniel Island Drive, Charleston, SC 29492 T 800.443.9441 E [email protected] W www.blackbaud.com 1
Blackbaud launched the Donor Perspectives survey in order to get a view of the nonprofit
sector from the donor perspective and, when relevant, compare findings to the results from
Blackbaud’s recently-released 2012 State of the Nonprofit Industry survey, which gauged
levels of nonprofit optimism and explored successful management strategies.
This report provides a snapshot of donor decision-making by looking at how much donors
gave in the past year and how that changed from the previous year, as well as donor
motivations, preferences, and behaviors.
SURVEY METHODOLOGY
Blackbaud engaged an international market research panel to reach charitable donors in the United States, United Kingdom and Australia.
The survey was open for a two week period in July and August 2012. More than 4,000 donors responded to the survey – 1,321 donors from
the US, 1,436 donors from the UK, and 1,576 donors from Australia – representing a wide range of ages, income levels, and education levels.
The results of this study have a +/-3 margin of error at a 95% confidence level.
OVERVIEW
THE DONOR LANDSCAPE: Giving and How It’s
Changed
• Donors reported moderate increases in their individual
donations to charity in the past year.
- The net percentage of donors increasing contributions was
highest in Australia at 11.5%, followed by the US at 7.8% and
the UK at 5.2%.
• There were some differences by country in drivers for
increased charitable contributions.
- US respondents tended to be more directly motivated by a
change in their financial situation.
- UK and Australian respondents were more likely to be driven by
an innate desire to help.
• In all three countries, the respondent’s current fiscal
situation was the main reason reported for decreased
contributions.
DONOR BEHAVIOR: Motivations, Preferences, and
Use of Mobile Technology
• Over 80% of respondents from each country reported
making one-off donations to at least one charity in the
past year.
- US respondents were most likely to make their last one-
off donation because of a personal circumstance, while
UK respondents were most likely to make their last one-off
donation through sponsoring a friend or colleague in an event.
• About two-thirds of respondents from each country reported
making regular donations to charity in the past year.
- Australian and US respondents were most likely to become
regular donors to organizations to which they currently
make one-off donations if their personal financial situation
improved, while UK respondents were most likely to report
that nothing would compel them to become a regular donor to
organizations to which they currently make one-off donations.
© November 2012 | 2000 Daniel Island Drive, Charleston, SC 29492 T 800.443.9441 E [email protected] W www.blackbaud.com 2
• Onaverage,asthenumberofcharitiestowhichdonors
made regular donations increased, so did the total amount
of financial contributions in all three countries.
• There were several significant differences between
countries and age groups with regard to the methods
donors preferred to use making donations.
- US donors were most likely to prefer to donate via check and
preferred donating by check significantly more than either UK
or Australian respondents.
- UK and Australian respondents were most likely to prefer to
donate via cash.
- UK respondents were more than twice as likely as Australian
respondents and more than four times as likely as US
respondents to prefer to donate via direct debit from a bank
checking account.
- Australian respondents were twice as likely as UK
respondents to prefer to donate via credit/debit card.
• On average, respondents from the US and UK who prefer
to donate via check reported donating more in the last 12
months than those who prefer other methods of donations,
while respondents from Australia who preferred to donate
via credit/debit card or direct debit reported giving more
than those who prefer other methods.
• US respondents were more likely to report using their
mobile phone to read emails, view websites, and make
charitable donations through an organization's website than
either UK or Australian respondents.
• Thelikelihoodofusingamobiledevicetoviewwebsites,
read emails, send SMS/text donations, or make charitable
contributions through an organization’s website
significantly decreased with age in all three countries.
© November 2012 | 2000 Daniel Island Drive, Charleston, SC 29492 T 800.443.9441 E [email protected] W www.blackbaud.com 3
How Individual Donations to Charity
Changed from the Previous Year
0%
10%
20%
35%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
15.9%
56.7%
27.4%
17.2%
60.4%
22.4%
19.8%
52.5%
27.6%
INCREASED
NO CHANGE
DECREASED
RESULTS
THE DONOR LANDSCAPE
Charitable Donations over the Past Year
The study results indicate that individual donations to charity
slightly increased in the US, UK, and Australia in the past year.
Approximately a one-quarter of donors from each country reported
that the amount they donated to charity increased from the previous
year, while less than 20% reported the amount they donated
decreased.
On average, US respondents reported donating nearly three times
as much to charity as UK or Australian donors.
Drivers for Change in Individual Giving
Many donors who decreased their individual contributions from the
previous year reported that the decrease was due to their current
financial situation or the state of the economy.
The top reasons reported for increases in financial contributions
from the previous year differed by country.
• USrespondents’decisionstoincreasecharitablecontributions
were most often impacted by a change in their personal
financial situation.
• UKandAustraliandonorscitedaninnatedesiretohelpasthe
driving factor behind the increased donations.
The average gross annual financial contribution increased as income
level increased for donors in all three countries; however, this
relationship was stronger for US donors than for UK or Australian
donors,reinforcingthatUSdonors’decisionsregardinghowmuch
to donate to charity are more directly impacted by their financial
situation than in the other two countries.
I recently became more involved in
volunteer and charity work and thus
became more aware of the costs involved
in their work. I wanted to help out more.
— Australian donor, 26, female
I just thought I should start giving
something back to those who need it
and I realised a bit of small change
can make a difference.
UK donor, 18, male
I try to give according to percentage of
income and my income increased.
US donor, 32, female
© November 2012 | 2000 Daniel Island Drive, Charleston, SC 29492 T 800.443.9441 E [email protected] W www.blackbaud.com 4
Donations by Age
Average total donations not only varied by country, they also varied
with age. In all three countries, the average amount donated to
charity annually increased with age.
• Onaverage,USdonorsovertheageof65gavemorethanthree
times the amount donated by those ages 18-24 and nearly twice
as much as donors ages 25-34.
• Onaverage,UKdonorsages55-64donatedtwiceasmuch
to charity than those ages 35-44 and four times as much as
those ages 18-24.
• Onaverage,Australiandonorsovertheageof65gavemore
than twice as much as donors ages 35-44 and more than three
times as much as those ages 18-24.
DONOR BEHAVIOR
To better understand donors, we asked them how frequently and why
they make one-time or regular donations, what factors compel them
to become regular donors, and how they use mobile technology.
The study asked about two styles of giving:
1. One-off donations, which are not scheduled to repeat
2. Regular donations, which are typically scheduled as direct
debit, recurring gifts
One-off gifts
One-off gifts, or single, non-repeating donations, are very prevalent
in all countries; approximately 85% of respondents from each country
Average Total Donations by Age Group
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+
$463
$154
$150
$800
$333
$470
$1,390
$245
$297
$1,396
$388
$367
$1,288
$511
$671
$1,403
$566
$373
Average Total Donations Made in Last 12 Months in US $
© November 2012 | 2000 Daniel Island Drive, Charleston, SC 29492 T 800.443.9441 E [email protected] W www.blackbaud.com 5
reportedly made one-off donations to at least one organization the
past year. In addition, more than half of donors from each country
reported making one-off donations to more than one charity in the
past year.
For US respondents, as the number of charities to which respondents
made one-time donations increased, the average amount of financial
contributions made in the last year also increased. This trend was
not present for UK and Australian respondents, however; in those
countries, the average total donations over the past 12 months
were static as the number of charities donors made one-off donations
to increased. The exception was respondents who made one-off
donations to five or more charities, as demonstrated in the chart
below.
Motivations for One-off Gifts
When asked what drove them to make their most recent one-off
donation, US respondents were most likely to report that they were
motivated by a personal circumstance with either themselves or
a loved one having been affected by the cause the organization
supported (21%), followed by sponsoring a friend or colleague
participating in an event (16%).
UK donors were most likely to have made their last one-off donation
by sponsoring a friend or colleague participating in an event (34%)
and were significantly more likely than US or Australian donors to
report making their last one-off donation for this reason.
Average Total Donations by Number of Charities to Which
One-off Donations Were Made
Average Total Donations Made in Last 12 Months in US $
Number of Charities to Which One-off Donations Were Made
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
0 1 2 3 4 5 +
$1,029
$283
$295
$684
$226
$333
$963
$365
$451
$1,463
$501
$366
$1,570
$312
$237
$2,207
$792
$583
© November 2012 | 2000 Daniel Island Drive, Charleston, SC 29492 T 800.443.9441 E [email protected] W www.blackbaud.com 6
Many Australian donors also reported being motivated by a personal
circumstance (22%) or made their last one-off donation by sponsoring
a friend or colleague participating in an event (19%). An additional 8%
said they gave their last one-off donation in response to a street or
door-to-door solicitation, which was not mentioned as frequently in
the US or UK.
Regular Gifts
Nearly two-thirds of respondents in each country reported making
regular donations, which are typically scheduled as recurring direct
debit gifts, to charity in the past year. Of those, approximately 40%
made regular donations to just one organization and another 30%
regularly contributed to two organizations.
In all three countries, as the number of charities to which donors
made regular donations increased, so did the average total donations
made to charity over the past year. In addition, UK and Australian
respondents reported donating more in the past 12 months when
they made regular donations to one or more organizations than those
who made one-off donations. In all three countries, the average total
donations drastically increased once a donor reported giving regularly
to five or more organizations.
Motivations for Regular Gifts
When asked what would motivate them to become regular donors to
organizations to which they currently made one-off donations, donors
from all three countries reported the top three factors that would
Average Total Donations by Number of Charities to Which
Regular Donations Were Made
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
0 1 2 3 4 5 +
$573
$153
$131
$1,091
$391
$278
$1,343
$377
$487
$1,797
$851
$707
$1,481
$632
$713
$2,716
$1,368
$1,953
Average Total Donations Made in Last 12 Months in US $
Number of Charities to Which Regular Donations Were Made
© November 2012 | 2000 Daniel Island Drive, Charleston, SC 29492 T 800.443.9441 E [email protected] W www.blackbaud.com 7
impact their decision were:
1. An improvement in their personal financial situation
2.Havingpassionaboutanorganization’smission
3. Access to information that proved the impact of their
contributions
32% of UK donors, 28% of Australian donors, and 19% of US donors
reported that nothing would compel them to become a regular donor
to charities to which they currently make one-off donations, however,
showing that a portion of each population may be reluctant to give in
this way.
On the flip side, of those that did make recurring donations, between
20% and 30% from each country reported they had stopped making
regular donations to an organization in the past three years. More
than 40% of donors from all three countries said the main reason was
that their personal financial situation required a reduction in charitable
giving. The second most
reported reason for stopping
regular donations was a feeling
that the charity was not making
the best use of its financial
resources.
When taken together, the results
indicate that while personal
finances greatly contribute to
donor decisions about regular
donations, charities can do
more to keep these important
donations. By tracking the
impact of contributions and
communicating that impact back to donors, nonprofits can increase
the number of regular donors and ensure they are not losing the
regular donors they have.
By tracking the impact
of contributions and
communicating that
impact back to donors,
nonprofits can increase
the number of regular
donors and ensure they
are not losing the regular
donors they have.
28.9%
20.1%
27.9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
40.49%
34.02%
12.64%
5.24%
7.61%
28.9%
20.1%
27.9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
40.49%
34.02%
12.64%
5.24%
7.61%
28.9%
20.1%
27.9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
40.49%
34.02%
12.64%
5.24%
7.61%
Donors Who Stopped Regular Donations to a Charity, by Country
What would compel you to become a regular donor to an
organization to which you currently make one-off donations?
...Education concerning the
company's goals, effectiveness,
and financial integrity.
US donor, 18, male
...If I could see that my money
is making a real difference.
UK donor, 19, male
...More information on what
the donation is actually
achieving or contributing to.
— Australian donor, 46, female
© November 2012 | 2000 Daniel Island Drive, Charleston, SC 29492 T 800.443.9441 E [email protected] W www.blackbaud.com 8
Donation Preferences for Method of Payment
The preferred method of payment also varied country to country and
with age.
• USdonorsweremostlikelytoprefertodonateviacheck,
preferring this method significantly more than either UK or
Australian donors.
• UKandAustralianrespondentsweremostlikelytopreferto
donate via cash.
• UKrespondentsweremorethantwiceaslikelyasAustralian
respondents and more than four times as likely as US
respondents to prefer to donate via direct debit from checking.
• AustraliandonorsweretwiceaslikelyasUKdonorstopreferto
donate via credit/debit card.
The findings about donor preferences are especially interesting
when compared to how nonprofits prefer to receive donations.
Blackbaud’s2012StateoftheNonprofitIndustryreportshowedthat
only 1% of Australian and 7% of UK nonprofits preferred to receive
cash donations despite this being the most preferred method of
donation for donors. Organizations in the UK reported they prefer to
receive donations via direct debit (47%) followed by check (27%). In
Australia, nonprofits reported they prefer credit/debit card donations
(44%) followed closely by direct debit (42%). The vast majority of US
nonprofits reportedly preferred check donations (70%) which is more
in sync with donor preferences in that country.
Donation Preferences by Age
Donation preferences become more nuanced when we look at the
role age plays. Specifically:
• Thepreferencetodonateviacashsignificantlydecreasedwith
age for donors from all countries.
• ForUSandAustraliandonors,thepreferencetodonatevia
direct debit slightly decreased with age while for UK donors it
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Cash Credit/Debit Direct Debit Check In-kind Other Text
4.3%
4.8%
7.6%
42.1%
40.0%
18.4%
33.2%
16.8%
23.0%
10.2%
25.8%
5.9%
6.9%
8.1%
43.1%
3.1%
3.0%
2.0%
0.2%
1.5%
0%
Preferred Method of Donation by Country
% of Respondents who Prefer Method
© November 2012 | 2000 Daniel Island Drive, Charleston, SC 29492 T 800.443.9441 E [email protected] W www.blackbaud.com 9
significantly increased with age.
• ForUSandUKdonors,thepreferencetodonateviacredit/
debit card increased with age, but for Australian donors this
preference decreased with age.
• Thepreferencetodonateviacheckslightlyincreasedwithage
for Australian and UK donors, but dramatically increased with
age for US donors.
In all three countries, there was a relationship between donation
preferences and the average annual contributions donors made to
charities over the past year.
• Onaverage,respondentsfromtheUSandUKwhopreferred
to donate via check reported donating more than those who
preferred other donation methods.
• Onaverage,Australianrespondentswhopreferredcredit/debit
card or direct debit reported donating more than those who
preferred other methods.
Again, looking at these results
through the lens of the 2012 State
of the Nonprofit Industry report
brings to light some interesting
conclusions. While most UK
charities (47%) preferred to receive
donations via direct debit, UK
donors who preferred to give via
check donated, on average, more
than twice as much as those who
preferred to donate via direct
debit. This trend is likely influenced
by the finding that older donors
tend to donate more and are more
likely to prefer to donate via check. This gap between donors and
nonprofits however, leads one to conclude that nonprofits should
keep donor preferences in mind and ensure donors are able to
contribute in various ways, or they may miss out on significant
contributions.
Average Total Annual Donations Segmented
by Preferred Donation Method
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
Text/SMS
In-kind
Cash
Credit/Debit Card
Direct Debit
Check
Average Total Donations In Last 12 Months in US $
Nonprofits should
keep donor preferences
in mind and ensure
donors are able to
contribute in various
ways or they may miss
out on significant
contributions
*Please note, these
amounts do not reflect the
total amount donated via
each method, but rather
the average amount donors
who preferred to donate via
each method gave in the
last 12 months.
© November 2012 | 2000 Daniel Island Drive, Charleston, SC 29492 T 800.443.9441 E [email protected] W www.blackbaud.com 10
Donor Use of Mobile Technologies
The study also explored how mobile technology is changing the
way donors interact with nonprofit organizations. In each country,
approximately half of donors reported they use their mobile phone to
read emails and view websites– yet less than one-quarter of donors
in each country reported using their mobile device to send SMS/text
donations and even fewer reported making charitable contributions
throughanorganization’swebsiteviatheirmobile.
There were slight cultural differences in the proportions of donors
using mobile technology to interact with charities. A slightly higher
proportion of US donors reported using their mobile phone to read
emails, view websites and make charitable donations than UK or
Australian donors. Interestingly, according to research recently
released by Google
, smart phone penetration is actually higher in
Australia (52%) and the UK (50%) than in the US (44%).
Comparing the results of the 2012 State of the Nonprofit
Industry study and Donor Perspectives survey also suggests
that donors have embraced mobile technologies faster than
nonprofits. According to the State of the Nonprofit Industry results,
approximately 30% of nonprofits in the US, UK, and Australia have
already enabled their website for mobile browsing while around
50% of donors in each country reported using their mobile phones
to view websites. Similarly, only 20% of UK nonprofits, 26% of
Australian nonprofits, and 29% of US nonprofits have already
optimized emails for mobile viewing while around half of donors in
each country reported viewing emails on their mobile device. The
projected growth of the use of mobile technologies in marketing
efforts, however, indicates that nonprofits have recognized the need
to embrace mobile strategies and have planned to do so in the next
year.
Finally, mobile behaviors are significantly influenced by the age
of the donor. In all three countries, the younger the respondent,
the more likely they were to use mobile devices to read emails,
view websites, make SMS/text donations, and make charitable
contributions.
OVER 70% of donors ages 18-24 reported using their mobile device to read emails and view
websites, while LESS THAN 40% of those over the age of 55 reported doing so.
In the US, the proportion
of donors who reported
using their mobile device to
make a SMS/text donation
DECREASED FROM
40%
for those under the age of 35
to 14%
for those 35 and older.
In the UK, the proportion of
donors who reported using
mobile devices to view websites
DECREASED FROM
75%
for those under the age of 35
to 57%
for those age 35-44
to 40%
for those age 45-54
In Australia, the proportion
of donors who reported
making a donation through
an organization’s website
on their mobile device
DECREASED FROM
18%
for donors under the age of 35
to 4%
for donors 55 and older.
© November 2012 | 2000 Daniel Island Drive, Charleston, SC 29492 T 800.443.9441 E [email protected] W www.blackbaud.com 11
© November 2012, Blackbaud, Inc.
This white paper is for informational purposes only.
Blackbaud makes no warranties, expressed or
implied, in this summary. The information contained
in this document represents the current view of
Blackbaud, Inc., on the items discussed as of the
date of this publication.
All Blackbaud product names appearing herein are
trademarks or registered trademarks of Blackbaud,
Inc. The names of actual companies and products
mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their
respective owners.
About Blackbaud
Serving the nonprot and education sectors for 30 years, Blackbaud (NASDAQ: BLKB) combines technology and expertise to help
organizations achieve their missions. Blackbaud works with more than 27,000 customers in more than 60 countries that support higher
education, healthcare, human services, arts and culture, faith, the environment, independent education, animal welfare, and other charitable
causes. The company offers a full spectrum of cloud-based and on-premise software solutions, and related services for organizations
of all sizes including: fundraising, eMarketing, social media, advocacy, constituent relationship management (CRM), analytics, nancial
management, and vertical-specic solutions. Using Blackbaud technology, these organizations raise more than $100 billion each year.
Recognized as a top company by Forbes, InformationWeek, and Software Magazine and honored by Best Places to Work, Blackbaud is
headquartered in Charleston, South Carolina and has employees throughout the US, and in Australia, Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, and
the United Kingdom.
CONCLUSION
Making it easier for donors to learn about your organization, answering their questions, and
providing clear vehicles for contributions is essential to successful fundraising. In this report,
Donor Perspectives attempts to make connections between how nonprofits conduct outreach
against donor motivations. Interestingly, the report found that nonprofits were not always
meeting constituents' needs through optimized communication or giving channels.
Overall, the respondents reported giving more to charities in the past year than in the
previous year. US contributors gave the most overall while older donors gave the greatest
amount across all countries. Motivations to give were similar for UK and Australian donors,
who expressed their innate desire to help, but US donors were primarily influenced by their
financial situation. The results of this study clearly indicate that age and culture play a major
role in how donors interact with nonprofits. As such, mobile technologies have become
increasingly important for younger donors.
By facilitating this project, Blackbaud seeks to shed light on what drives donor behavior. In
assisting nonprofits to maximize their strategies, nonprofits can increase gifts, reach new
audiences and retain current donors.