2
VA-24-W Early Neurological Stimulation (ENS): Implications for canine welfare and management
ight” response. The eects of short-term, mild stress
can be benecial, creating “robustness” in the body
and preparing it to deal more eectively with stressors
later in life (Levine, 1960; and reviewed in Meaney,
2001; Pryce and Feldon, 2003). However, not all stress
is equal. High-intensity or long-term stress is often
detrimental, either because of overwhelming the
body’s ability to respond, or leading to negative side
eects from a sustained “ght-or-ight” process, which
depletes energy and the ability to resist disease (Selye,
1956).
Studies of ENS began with rat pups, and currently,
most of the published work in this area is rodent-
focused. Rat pups handled early in life were much
less fearful when exposed to an auditory stimulus
(Schaefer, 1963), had lower corticosterone levels
when restrained by a person (Plotsky and Meaney,
1993), and were less resistant to being captured after
stress (Núñez et al., 1996). These ndings have since
generated interest in exploring the eects of ENS in
other species, including dogs.
Applications and eects of ENS on
puppy development
As is the case for rodents, it is believed that ENS
may provide stimulation to the developing puppy’s
endocrine system and cause him/her to develop more
ability to deal with stressful events later in life. This
may lead to better learning and an improved ability to
cope with adversity. Though some of this belief stems
from the benets of ENS shown in other species, it has
also been advanced by unpublished work conducted
as part of a US Military Working Dog (MWD) training
program called “Bio Sensor,” later discussed by Battaglia
(2009). Specic claims on the eects of “Bio Sensor”
listed in Battaglia’s discussion include “improved”
heart rate, “stronger” heartbeats and adrenal glands,
and increased stress tolerance and disease resistance
(Battaglia, 2009), although how these eects were
measured was not specied. The “Bio Sensor” program
exercises included the following:
1. Tactile Stimulation: the puppy is “tickled” between
the foot pads on any one foot with a Q-Tip (3-5
seconds)
2. Head Erect: the puppy is held perpendicular to the
ground with both hands, orienting its head above its
tail (3-5 seconds)
3. Head Down: the puppy is held perpendicular to the
ground with both hands, orienting its tail above its
head (3-5 seconds)
4. Supine: the puppy rests with its back in the palms of
both hands, with its nose oriented toward the ceiling
(3-5 seconds)
5. Thermal Stimulation: a damp towel is placed in
fridge for at least 5 minutes; place puppy on towel
on all fours and do not restrain movement (3-5
seconds)
To date, only a few studies have been conducted on
ENS in dogs using various handling exercises, and
these have shown variable results. For example, a study
by Fox and Stelzner (1966) applied an ENS treatment
that included exposure to light and sound, movement,
cold, swimming, grooming, and a check of the puppy’s
reexes. The entire ENS treatment took one hour per
puppy and was done daily from day one to 5 weeks
of age. After three weeks, 10 minutes of play with the
researcher was added in. Puppies were weighed and
their heart rates were measured weekly. They were
then behaviorally tested at 5 weeks, and the body
weights, heart rates, and reexes of ENS puppies
were compared with those who did not receive ENS
treatment. Handled puppies explored more, were
more social toward humans and more condent when
engaged in a social situation with other dogs. They also
were better at problem-solving. They had increased
heart rates compared to puppies that did not receive
ENS, but there were no dierences in their weights or
reexes (Fox and Stelzner, 1966).
Another study looked at the eects of ENS on dogs
being raised in homes and those kept in professional
breeding kennels. The ENS consisted of a 5-minute
gentle whole-body massage with the puppy lying
both on its back and on its stomach (Gazzano et al.,
2008). This was done daily for days 3-21 of life. The
puppies were later behaviorally tested at 8 weeks
of age. Handled and unhandled puppies from both
the kennels and the homes were compared. In an
isolation test, all handled puppies regardless of
housing explored the environment more. There were
no dierences between any groups in their heart rates
or reactions to dierent objects and an unfamiliar
environment and person (Gazzano et al., 2008).